Connect With Us (+1) 646 827 3800

Achieving Influency* Through Long Tail Marketing and Search Modeling

Tag Archives: twitter

If Oprah Uses Twitter But Can’t Spell, Does It Count?

Oprah, Twitter, Media, Marketing, and Misspelled Hashtags

You get a car! And YOU get a car! And YOU GET A CAR!

But if you misspell “car”, did the marketing work?

Like so many of us, Oprah is “on Twitter“.  And when you’re Oprah, it almost doesn’t matter what you say or how you say it, because people will follow you, turn your word into gospel, and pass that gospel on.

What if you can’t spell?

Once again, if you’re Oprah it doesn’t matter. But when Oprah recommended the new Microsoft Surface tablet, but did so while using an iPad—funny enough all by itself—she unwittingly raised some interesting questions about . . . hashtags.

Twitter and Google Agree on Something, But . . . What?

This morning, I happened to flip on “Good Morning America”. Like many people, I’ve given up on TV News, but I stumbled across ABC’s produced-by-the-news-division-but-felt-like-a-gossip-program vehicle and stuck around long enough to see the repeated entreaties by GMA’s on-air staff that everyone Tweet using the hashtag #TeamRobin. Robin Roberts is a host on GMA, and this morning she’s undergoing a bone marrow transplant. Good luck, Robin, and a speedy recovery!

“Ranting About S*** At Work” on Facebook and Twitter

In the early hours of this morning, my son Mike tweeted this expletive-laced apology to his Twitter Community.

You can only imagine my pride.

Being a stickler for manners, I was happy to see that Mike thought his overuse of Twitter was worth an apology. But as a web-and-smartphone Twitter user I wasn’t sure what he was apologizing for; I never saw the 133 tweets he referred to—because, let’s face it, most of your tweets are never seen by most of your followers.

And then it hit me: I’ve always hated texting. And now I see a new reason to hate it.

Social Networking, But No Social Graces

social-media-ungrateful-iphone

If I hadn’t seen it myself, twice, I wouldn’t believe it.

In both the example above (courtesy of my son Mike’s Tumblr) and this example at Gizmodo, social media/social networking (via Twitter) show just how ugly it can be.

Facebook, you aren’t off the hook, but Twitter does seem to be a more rife grounds for this kind of thing.

SERIOUSLY? Tweeting about your displeasure with the Christmas gifts you received? And not just general “I wish I got better stuff for Christmas”—which would be no more or less self-indulgent than “Bob just ate a taco!”, but “my dad is a jerk because he didn’t get me the iPhone I asked for“.

Social Media: The Way To Use Twitter … Isn’t Like This

A few weeks ago, I wrote a post talking about how, even in the era of social media, journalists don’t care what their readers think. Yesterday, I came across this article at Inc., where Jeff Haden, a business and technology writer for that small business magazine , a professional ghost writer, and a wedding photographer, acknowledged that maybe he’s using Twitter the wrong way.

Kudos to Mr. Haden for seeing that he can use help. But so far, shame on him for not doing anything about it.

Facebook’s 4.74 Degrees of Separation

Social Networking, Depression, and Isolation

SEO on Social Networking, Isolation, and Depression

 

Almost two years ago, I told you that rather than bringing people closer together, social networking causes isolation and depression. Here at our little a-few-thousand-visitors-per-month outpost, that story attracts visitors, every day, even now (proving, again, that this research on the half-life of an Internet link is flawed).

If you can read the tiny second graphic above, you’ll see that the big three search engines rank that two-year-old piece pretty well for the phrases “social networking isolation” and “social networking depression“, despite it being the one and only time I’ve talked about the topic. That speaks, of course, to the way we do Search Engine Optimization at Answer Guy Central, and of course to the validity of our ideas about long-tail marketing.

Now here’s a new idea: Six Degrees of Separation? That’s so pre-social networking.

A new study shows that there aren’t six degrees of separation any longer. At least, there aren’t that many degrees on Facebook. At the world’s favorite social network, there are just 4.74 degrees separating a person chosen randomly from another random person.

If you read that article, you’ll see that there are some questions as to the methodology of the study, not the least of which is that it was conducted specifically on Facebook users. That’s called “using a self-selecting sample” and speaks to a point I’ve made several times here: statistics lie. But it also makes something clear: social networking in general and Facebook in particular are genuinely shrinking the world.

There’s good and bad in that. A genuinely smaller world is more likely to come up with solutions to problems like war and famine; the brighter the light shined on a problem, the better chance there is at solving it. But the bad side is that with so much information flying about between so many people and so much background noise as a result, it’s harder than ever to be heard—or found.

Do I need to say it again? Well, yes, sure I do, both because I want to be heard and because I want you to be:

Search Engine Optimization matters. Want to know how? Contact me, right now:

Twitter Innovates Advertising. I Never Thought I’d Say That.

When Facebook suggested I be friends with Lady Gaga, I was not amused.

My position on the inappropriateness of Faceboook’s patent on the news feed portion of their service  is well-known, and a cornerstone of our Search Engine Optimization practice.

I’ve also picked on Twitter a bunch of times. “What I ate for breakfast” jokes notwithstanding, the longer Twitter is around the more it feels like a cacophonous mass of mostly-me-too drivel.

Problogger Darren Rowse Doesn’t Want You To Follow Him

How many people are watching what you say on the Internet? Do you care?

The second question was rhetorical; of course you care. But the first question is hard to answer, and even if you have the answer it might not matter.

I’ve written a couple of times about the (un)importance of follower count on Twitter. This post is about how little your Twitter raw follower count matters, and this one explains why you’re more influential on Twitter than Ashton Kutcher, a guy with a HUGE number of followers.

SUE ME! British Soccer King Ryan Giggs Beds Imogen Thomas

Imogen Thomas

Ryan Giggs had an Affair With Imogen Thomas. There, I said it.

I don’t know if it’s true, by the way. In fact, until this morning I had never heard of eitther the British soccer star Mr. Giggs or the model-turned-reality-TV-contestant Ms. Thomas. But if Twitter says that the married Ryan Giggs had an affair with the sultry Imogen Thomas, it must be true, right?

Matt Drudge, Tribes, Facebook, Twitter, and You

Facebook became bigger than Google over a year ago. Twitter is huge. But you know who’s bigger? Matt Drudge.

Drudge, the impresario of The Drudge Report,  of course isn’t actually bigger than Twitter or Facebook. But he’s more influential. The Drudge report sends more traffic to other web sites than anyone else, including Facebook and Twitter.

That doesn’t help Matt Drudge directly, not that he needs help. Except: maybe it does; if The Drudge Report drives that much traffic, it can sell that much more advertising, at a higher price.

Don’t Anger Twitter. They Own You. Or Your Words. Or Not.

As you know, there’s this Twitter thing making the rounds of the Intertubes. All the kids are doing it. People have stopped blogging. 140 characters is the limit for most anything you have to say. Which of course means I’ve already gone too far here.

Yikes! Stay with me, please.

I’m not going to do a rant against Twitter. Twitter drives me crazy, but I use it, and I’ve suggested that you need to, also, more than a few times. But last week Twitter fired a shot heard across the Internet when they turned off the services of several of the companies that make Twitter “client” software. Coopetition? What Coopetition?

On Twitter, You’re More Important Than Ashton Kutcher!

You know all those followers Ashton Kutcher and Kim Kardashian have on Twitter? Remember how I’ve told you that follower count just isn’t that important? Now, there’s proof.

It’s true, despite Ms. Kardashian’s seemingly important role in the Twitterverse, and Mr. Kutcher’s claim to fame as the first person ever to have over a million Twitter followers (he’s now over six million), new research shows that the most imprtant thing about social networking turns out to be the “social” part.

Changing Norms: Handshakes and Twitter Pop Psychology

Hi! How Ya Doin’?        <shake hands>

While some people refuse the handshake convention on germophobic grounds, there’s always some ritual that takes place when you meet a new person, or encounter someone you don’t see all the time. On the Internet, these established social norms and conventions change.

Social Networking? Take away something as simple as a handshake and what you get is more like a social disconnect.

Almost eighteen months ago Seth Godin wrote about shaking hands. His main point was that social norms take time to develop, but that the Internet has become so large, so fast, that in social networking, there are no social norms.

Great Customer Service? NYC Orthodox Jews at B&H

I’m not big on being politically correct “just because”. In fact, while there are places where PC behavior is important (no sexual harassment, please!), shaking things up every now and then is a good thing. It’s how business change gets started.

That said, I’ll point out the life preserver here: I’m a New York Jew, so I get something of a pass both for using the phrase and for discussing the stereotypes that both New York City people in general and Jews from this city get thrown at them. I’m not Orthodox, though, so if I’ve offended you by adding that one to this discussion, well, you know where to find me.

When A Tweet Falls in the Forest and No-one Hears It …

Guess what? Nobody’s reading your Words of Wisdom on Twitter.

Actually, it’s possible that many people are reading what you write, but if research from Sysomos is to be believed, 71% of the time people Tweet, absolutely nobody responds.

This dovetails with a couple of things I’ve written about before: your follower count on Twitter is pretty much meaningless, and unless you have a reason to tweet, you shouldn’t bother.

The question, though, remains: how should your business use social networking?





Answer Guy Central Influency and Integrated Marketing, New York NY 10128

 

Copyright © 2004-2013, PC-VIP Inc

Return Home

Connect With Us (+1) 646 827 3800